|
Denehurst has close links with major contract research laboratories involved with GLP and non-GLP chemical safety
testing. Services include advice on protocols, preparing contracts, monitoring test work and interpretation of
data.
The first stage of any test programme is to ensure that such testing is justified and that alternatives such as modelling,
read-across or use of published data are not possible.
Denehurst encourages clients to enter contracts directly with test laboratories to reduce unecessary administrational
work. However, when requested, Denehurst can place test work on behalf of clients.
|
|
Laboratory testing should be performed as the final option. Even for regulatory submission, attempts should be made to obtain data from other
sources and where such data is not available, you need to ask where testing is actually possible. And if you still find that work is required to enable an adequate assessment of the chemical or that a
regulatory agency demands that such work should be performed, you are then faced with decisions on how to go about that testing.
Note that for self-classification of substances and preprations and
for justification of SDSs and Labelling, good scientifically sound data is acceptable even if not conducted to the precise
guidelines and if not performed to GLP. Denehurst can offer advice on justification of data and will endeavour to avoid
further testing.
Guidelines
and GLP
Technical guidelines for testing have been agreed by members of the Organisation
for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The same organisation has also
provided guidelines for Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) to provide a quality system for the testing.
However, following a test guideline and filling in the appropriate forms to
claim GLP compliance is not necessarily a substitute for good science and each study performed should be conducted in the
best way to meet the objectives of that study for that particular chemical. Guidelines
are what they say: guidelines. They are designed to help and not restrict the
use of science.
List of guidelines
The
OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals are available to buy from the OECD, either individually or as a set of two binders
containing loose-leaf paper copies. Alternatively, the Guidelines are also available
on CD-ROM. Draft guidelines can be downloaded free for consultation from the
OECD web-site.
The
EU Guidelines were published in Directive 92/69/EEC as Annex V of Directive 67/548/EEC.
Over the years since publication, amendments to these methods have been made and new guidelines introduced. Most of the guidelines are transcripts of OECD guidelines (the most notable exceptions being flammability
and explosivity guidelines).
The EU guidelines can be downloaded for free from the European Chemicals Bureau web-site http://ecb.jrc.it/testing-methods/
Australian guidelines and those of many other countries are based firmly on OECD methods, although the US and Japan
notably have some restrictions on what they require. To overcome national differences,
the OECD guidelines are often with phrases such as ‘can be’ or ‘may be included’.
Good Laboratory
Practice (GLP)
In many ways, GLP is
common sense. The basic theology of GLP is that thou shalt record everything
and leave a data trail for others to follow behind you. It is easy to get bogged
down by GLP and make it the over-riding criteria to follow when conducting laboratory work.
However, it is important not to lose sight of science and GLP has the potential to stifle open investigation.
Somewhere in the middle is
a sound compromise. GLP sets important standards for recording data, reporting,
reviewing and maintaining records. It does not guarantee the quality of the data
being recorded and a balance between good science and good working practice is the goal to aim for.
GLP is required for regulatory submissions around the World, although if you only intend to use the data for the purposes
of safety data sheets or labelling, the need to run the test to GLP standards must be questioned. The main reason for questioning it is when a flash point study that takes about an hour to perform, can
take up to a month to report at a cost of up to € 1000 if performed to meet GLP.
OECD / EC Test Method index
|
OECD
TG No. |
EU
Guideline |
Study Description |
|
101 |
|
UV-Vis Absorption spectra |
|
102 |
A1 |
Melting point |
|
103 |
A2 |
Boiling point |
|
104 |
A4 |
Vapour pressure |
|
105 |
A6 |
Water solubility |
|
106 |
C18 |
Adsorption / desorption in soils (batch equilibrium method) |
|
107-117-122 |
A8 |
Partition coefficient (shake flask, HPLC, pH-metric) |
|
108 |
|
Complex formation ability in water |
|
109 |
A3 |
Density |
|
110 |
|
Particle size distribution |
|
111 |
C7 |
Hydrolysis as a function of pH |
|
112 |
|
Dissociation constant |
|
113 |
|
Screening study for thermal stability in air |
|
114 |
|
Viscosity of liquids |
|
115 |
A5 |
Surface tension of aqueous solutions |
|
116 |
A7 |
Fat solubility |
|
118 |
A18 |
Polymer number-average molecular weight |
|
119 |
A19 |
Low molecular weight content of polymers |
|
120 |
A20 |
Solution/extraction behaviour of polymers in water |
|
|
A21 |
Oxidising properties, liquids |
|
121 |
C19 |
Estimation of adsorption coefficient in sewage sludge by HPLC |
|
|
A9 |
Flash point |
|
|
A10-A11 |
Flammability, solids / gasses |
|
|
A12 |
Flammability in contact with water |
|
|
A13 |
Spontaneous combustion |
|
|
A14 |
Explosivity |
|
|
A15 |
Auto-ignition, liquids |
|
|
A16 |
Auto flammability, solids |
|
|
A17 |
Oxidising properties |
|
|
A21 |
Oxidising properties, liquid |
|
OECD
TG No. |
EU
Guideline |
Study Description |
|
201 |
C3 |
Algal growth inhibition |
|
202 |
C2 |
Daphnia immobilisation |
|
203 |
C1 |
Acute fish toxicity |
|
204 |
|
Prolonged toxicity to fish |
|
205 |
|
Acute bird dietary toxicity |
|
206 |
|
Bird reproduction |
|
207 |
C8 |
Earthworm toxicity |
|
208 |
|
Higher plant toxicity |
|
209 |
C11 |
Activated sludge respiration inhibition |
|
210 |
|
Fish, early life stage |
|
211 |
C20 |
Daphnia reproduction toxicity |
|
212 |
C15 |
Fish, short-term test on embryo / sac-fry |
|
213 |
C16 |
Bees, acute oral toxicity |
|
214 |
C17 |
Bees, acute contact toxicity |
|
215 |
C14 |
Fish, Juvenile growth test |
|
216 |
|
Soil micro-organisms |
|
217 |
|
Soil micro-organisms carbon transformation |
|
218 |
|
Sediment-water chironomid toxicity (spiked sediment) |
|
219 |
|
Sediment-water chironomid toxicity (spiked water) |
|
220 |
|
Enchytraedae reproduction |
|
221 |
|
Lemna growth inhibition |
|
OECD
TG No. |
EU
Guideline |
Study Description |
|
301A |
C4a |
Ready biodegradation, DOC die-away |
|
301B |
C4c |
Ready biodegradation, CO2 evolution test |
|
|
|